Kline v. Zimmer, Inc. – Impact on the Legal Landscape of Expert Testimony


The May 2022 California Court of Appeal case, Kline v. Zimmer, Inc., stands for the general proposition that a defendant may have an expert testify as to possible alternative causes of an injury to rebut a plaintiff’s expert, even if those alternative possible causes do not rise to a reasonable degree of medical certainty. Using examples from their recent trial, Martinez v. Harman Fitness, PSR...

Sign Up to View More!
JOIN PSR PLAYBOOK Learn from the best as part of our exclusive Plaintiff Lawyer network.
* Required
Membership is free to access our digital library and live events.